Which autoconf for libstdc++

Phil Edwards phil@jaj.com
Sat Dec 20 09:37:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:49:06PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> benjamin> Current versions of these tools are
> benjamin> autoconf-2.59
> benjamin> automake-1.8
> 
> benjamin> If the java and c++ folks agree to this then I guess the
> benjamin> next step would be to post a RFC on the gcc list, and then
> benjamin> set AC_PREREQ?
> 
> This all sounds good to me.  Let's do it.

Let's not.  At least not yet.

I've been trying to convert v3 to use those versions, and some of the new
behavior is causing problems.  Depending on how easy/hard/possible it is
to work around them, we might want to standardize on the previous versions.

-- 
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
    - Brian W. Kernighan



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list