Missing inlines?

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de writes:

| >> Has no inline.
| >> I wonder if this is wanted?
| 
| > Perhaps, but it isn't required for templates.
| 
| Is my memory wrong? I can remember compilers warning about multiple
| definitions of the same template instantiation when you missed the inline.

I've heard that for some broken proprietary compilers that have
managed to pervert the meaning of "inline".

| Is this behavior standard? Or is this GCC specific?

GCC behaviour is standard-required  behaviour.

-- Gaby