Missing inlines?

[Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de]

>> Has no inline.
>> I wonder if this is wanted?

> Perhaps, but it isn't required for templates.

Is my memory wrong? I can remember compilers warning about multiple
definitions of the same template instantiation when you missed the inline.

Is this behavior standard? Or is this GCC specific?

>> I think it should be ok to add this missing inlines.

> It is ok, but perhaps not required.

I added them all, I hope. Rebuilt compiler. And now the relevant exception
in a relativ big program gets caught.
But this is no proof that this was the failure. But I hope for the best.


Joerg