Something about std::list<> member functions.

[Joe Buck]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:28:07AM -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
> >Then, I discovered that our lovely compiler is not always inlining
> >those pretty trivial function objects.  Then I didn't apply the
> >patches. 
> 
> Gaby, you might want to see if -funit-at-a-time helps with the inlining
> issues.

So it's back to Gaby's earlier controversial thread on the gcc list: it
should be possible to get g++ to do proper inlining without having to
resort to a method that has to consume more memory.