Feedback on __mt_alloc?
Stefan Olsson
stefan@snon.net
Thu Apr 24 19:26:00 GMT 2003
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>>Looking at the current stl_alloc.h that would only be __malloc_alloc and
>>__debug_alloc right?
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking of moving them all over, so __pool_alloc would also be fair game.
>
>
>
Hmmm...
...so stl_alloc.h would only contain __new_alloc as required by the
standard? That would be really nice and clean!
Where would the pool_alloc.h file (along with the other SGI specific
code such as __simple_alloc for _Alloc_traits etc) be included then for
"compability"? In stl_alloc.h?
There are quite a few bits and pieces in the stl_alloc file that I'm
uncertain about what they do - or if they are used at all :(
Brgds
/Stefan
--
Experience is what you get when you were expecting something else.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list