Feedback on __mt_alloc?

Stefan Olsson stefan@snon.net
Thu Apr 24 18:08:00 GMT 2003


Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>Basically we're thinking about where/how to go from here - the code is 
>>now used in production on our end and if it's not of interest to the 
>>libstdc++ project (right now anyway) we'll just post the code, updates 
>>on snon.net as an option for users to try out if they like.
>>    
>>
>
>Certainly, it is of interest! I'd like it to be distributed with
>libstdc++. It was my hope that somebody else would take care of doing
>the integration work, however.
>
No problem - we'll try to follow the instructions!

>
>If you've already got the copyright assignment, etc, then it can be
>integrated straight away. If not, please see:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/contribute.html
>
Ok, we'll do that a.s.a.p!

>
>My suggestion for integrating this would be:
>
>1) move all non-required allocators and types out of
>include/bits/stl_alloc.h and into separate files in ext/*_alloc.h.
>
Looking at the current stl_alloc.h that would only be __malloc_alloc and 
__debug_alloc right?

Brgds

/Stefan

-- 
Experience is what you get when you were expecting something else.




More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list