PATCH: libstdc++/7680 (related to RFC posted last week)

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 05:10:39PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 07:48:18PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > | Your namespace usage is fine to me. We seem to be heading in the
> > | direction of multiple implementation namespaces, which I think is a good
> > | idea as long as we all agree what goes where. I did think that all
> > | __gnu_cxx bits were private already though. Would this imply that
> > | __gnu_cxx is not private?
> 
> Well, it kinda tromps on the extensions we've been telling users about.

Yes, the FAQ expicitly tells users to use __gnu_cxx, since the SGI
extensions such as hash_map are declared in that namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html#5_4

jon


--
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
	- William Gibson