new autocrasher errors
Phil Edwards
phil@jaj.com
Fri Oct 11 23:42:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:55:21PM -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Mainline has additional symbols, due to the codecvt work, and missing
> symbols, due to the first round of allocator cleanups, and cannot
> reasonably expected to be binary compatible with the 3_2-branch library.
>
> I consider this ok. Mainline is not a release branch so I'm not too
> worried about it at the moment. These patches are easy to revert, in
> any case, if a new stable branch is cut and ABI compatibility is
> desired.
Agreed.
> However, when the autocrasher catches up, the 3_2-branch library
> sources, built with g++'s of gcc and gcc_3_2-branch should be
> interchangeable.
>
> It doesn't look like they are right now:
> http://www.devphil.com/build/newchain_oldlib.txt
There have been additional FAILs, too, since Wednesday:
http://www.devphil.com/build/reports/tests-trunk/regress.png
http://www.devphil.com/build/reports/tests-trunk/2002-10-09
> Any more details possible?
Right now sources are only update once a day, at 3:30 in the morning,
my time. Which... *checks gcc-patches* ...was right in the middle of
when you checked your changes in. So in another couple hours we should
see something new.
I want to change the scripts to do builds more often, and complain when
they break, but coursework has grabbed my free evenings this week.
> Also, abi_check.cc will have to be augmented to deal with related
> symbol versions, ie GLIBCPP_3.2.1 is not something to worry about.
> Anybody have any good ideas about how this should be done? Symbol
> versions are stored as strings right now so I guess that helps.
I'll have to sleep on this one. New ground for me.
Phil
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list