gcc 3.2 compilation problem]

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Mon Nov 18 17:00:00 GMT 2002


>Or, just mention that the simplistic version doesn't work, quoting Gaby?

I think Gaby's reponse today was the clearest I'd seen:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-11/msg00180.html

Whatever you do, please include this info. Thanks for taking care of
this: it's too bad the libstdc++ docs have been incorrect!

-benjamin



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list