PR6678?
Benjamin Kosnik
bkoz@redhat.com
Mon May 27 03:02:00 GMT 2002
> interesting to compare such behavior with that of 3.0.4: if wecan
> assess that this is a regression from 3.0.4 we can raise the priority
> of the PR to HIGH and almost certainly someone will look into it
> before 3.1.1.
This should be bumped up to HIGH now. I don't think it is a regression,
but it is serious. I noticed something similar when I did the valgrind
fixups.
I'm not quite sure what the deal is.
-benjamin
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list