Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3

[Steve Ellcey]

> > I just had a thought about this patch making libstdc++-v3 dependent on
> > libiberty.  Isn't linking a shared library against an archive one
> > considered a bad thing?  libstdc++-v3 can be built shared or archive but
> > it looks like libiberty is always archive only.  Does this introduce
> > problems when libstdc++-v3 is linked against libiberty?
> 
> Hmmmm. I don't know.
> 
> Did you ever figure out the C99 issue?

No, but I don't think it is necessarily a problem.  strtoll gets added
to libstdc++ and used by __convert_to_v the way it needs to be, whether
or not it should even be available as a standalone function, I just
don't know.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com