Library bug - Problem with string(string::reverse_iterator, string::reverse_iterator)

[Paolo Carlini]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

>I think Benjamin wanted to say
>
>   __beg == _InIter()
>
>Patch pre-approved for both mainline and branch.
>
Fine. Thanks Gaby. If nobody beats me I will take care of this (after 
due testing) later today.

>The sanity check is there to catch non-sensical data; since that isn't
>exptected to happen frequently it was suggested to use the
>__builtin_expect() to instruct the optimizer to do its best about that
>check. 
>
Thanks again for the explanation.

Ciao, Paolo.