gcc-3_1-branch and pending patches.

[Phil Edwards]

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:05:19AM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Also, at some point, perhaps a written guideline on what constitutes a
> non-ABI-breaking patch should be formulated.

That would be helpful beyond words.


> Also, I believe that the recommendation for distributors should be to
> use --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs and --with-gxx-include-dir=
> to version headers. Is this correct?

To my understanding, yes.

For the record, I feel these should be on by default somehow.  Gaby also
thinks that versioning should be done by default, but has a different
approach.


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams