[wwwdocs] clean up v3 web pages, shuffle bits

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:46:40PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > > +   <a href="../cvs.html">those for the rest of the compiler</a>.  Checking
> > > +   out the <code>gcc</code> module will also get the library sources; to
> > 
> > Should that be "will also get the compiler sources" ?
> 
> Nope.  :-)
> 
> I wanted to make it clear that users don't need to get gcc and libstdc++
> separately.  Getting gcc will get libstdc++ automatically.

Yes, I see that now. I read it from a very libstdc++-centric point of
view (i'd obviously just spent too long reading this list, catching up
after a holiday) and read it as meaning "if you want libstdc++, you could
checkout `gcc' instead and get a free compiler with it!"
(hence my confused question)
But that would imply a free compiler as in beer, not speech - which is all
wrong.
I think I should shut up now  :)