thoughts on libstdc++-3.0.96

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Wed Jan 30 11:45:00 GMT 2002


> Since "tarballs" is plural, does that mean another matched pair, one for
> mainline and one modified to work with 3.0?

Yep.

> I agree that it's a good idea.  Are you keeping a list of what's changed
> from .9x to .9x+1?  ('Cause I sure haven't been...)

I'll do this today, and put the tenative tarballs up. I'll send email 
when this is done.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list