XHTML 1.0 compliance (libstdc++/)
Wed Feb 20 10:46:00 GMT 2002
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> according to validator.w3.org these docs aren't fully conforming,
> because the DTD says they are plain HTML, which means the self-closing
> tags such as <link ... /> are illegal.
Yes, you're right.
> Was the DTD left as HTML intentionally, so that it is handled correctly
> by browsers that aren't fully conformant (i.e. most of them) ?
We left the DTD intentionally and will switch to an XHTML DTD when all of
our pages have been converted to XHTML (which should be the case really
Gerald "Jerry" firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
More information about the Libstdc++