An even better implementation of 184.108.40.206.2 ??
Tue Feb 19 01:22:00 GMT 2002
if I understand well what results from the discussion of yesterday, we
should not only revert my "fix" for libstdc++/5708, but also
unconditionally output a "plain" space for the space field (this is
required by the presence of the space field itself and has nothing to do
with the filling with the fill char). That is:
// At least one space is required, but if internal
// formatting is required, an arbitrary number of
// fill spaces will be necessary.
__res += __ctype.widen(' ');
__res += string_type(__width - __len - 1, __fill);
Do we all agree about this??
More information about the Libstdc++