[libstdc++] Option to allow symbol versioning
Thu Feb 14 14:36:00 GMT 2002
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:26:28PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Say GLIBCPP_3.1? And CXXABI_1 for libsupc++?
> (BTW, Something I'd been meaning to ask: shouldn't libsupc++ be renamed
> to libcxa?)
*shrug* I don't know that it makes much difference. I thought
there was a bit more in libsupc++ than the CXXABI_1 symbols.
More information about the Libstdc++