verbose terminate() on by default

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Mon Dec 23 09:14:00 GMT 2002


On Dec 23, 2002, Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:06:47PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> 
>> Dynamic linking is not always available on embedded systems, where
>> code size matters the most.  The verbose implementation may bring in a
>> lot of stuff that the developer may have tried hard to avoid using.

> Yeah, we should do something special with freestanding environments.

Embedded != freestanding.  Not having fprintf is one thing, preferring
not to use it is an entirely different matter.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list