basic-improvements merge status

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > The simplest approach would be something like TARGET_MEM_FUNCTIONS.
> 
> OK, I will create updated patch with TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS macro and set
> it via linux.h file.  Does this sound sane?

(a) The macro should be defined so that the normal sense (no definition in 
the .h file) is that the C99 functions _are_ available, as this will be 
usual in future.  TARGET_MEM_FUNCTIONS is the wrong way round; using the 
standard functions should be the default.

(b) If the approach of replacing missing functions in libgcc is followed 
(which can also get rid of TARGET_MEM_FUNCTIONS) then it might be more 
appropriate to use a list in config.gcc of missing C library functions 
that need to go in libgcc.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk