patches to move to gcc-3_2-branch

[Mark Mitchell]

--On Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:20:50 PM -0600 Benjamin Kosnik 
<bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>> Upon looking at it closely, it is really hard for me to consider this
>> a regression.  User's use of __USE_MALLOC has always been problematic
>> in v3.
>
> This is a regression against 2.95 era compilers (v2), where __USE_MALLOC
> was possible. I thought these still counted, or do all regressions have
> to be against 3.x series compilers? Perhaps I'm just confused.

You're correct; regressions against 2.95 are still regressions.

If you don't feel you can merge the patch safely, that would be a reason
not to do it; otherwise, you should go ahead and do it.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com