user-defined types and basic_string

Gabriel Dos Reis gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Mon Aug 26 12:21:00 GMT 2002


Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

| For archival purposes.... I find the aggregate syntax pretty awkward,

I completely agree with you. 

However, I don't know how to phrase, with simple words, the concept of
"almost POD" data types wich would be handy in the current situation.


-- Gaby



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list