[v3] remove non-standard basic_filebuf members, fd, FILE filebufs

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Sun Apr 28 12:38:00 GMT 2002


> Thoughts?

I suppose there is no reason, at this time, to have separate classes for
fd_filebuf and file_filebuf. One class with both ctors would be
sufficient.

So, I guess the question is, would people be upset if the filebuf API
changed? Do the proposed extensions mollify those upset? 

-benjamin



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list