sparcv9 vs. sparc testresults
Benjamin Kosnik
bkoz@redhat.com
Tue Apr 9 10:15:00 GMT 2002
Nice to see sparc-solaris testresults back into the acceptable range.
However... how come the sparcv9 testresults are so much better for libstdc++?
It looks like these toolchains are configured identically.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00316.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00317.html
Extra fails:
FAIL: 18_support/numeric_limits.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_virtuals.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base_storage.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/streambuf.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/stringbuf.cc execution test
?
-benjamin
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list