[PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Mon Apr 1 08:36:00 GMT 2002
> Incidently, Mark, I think we all agreed that new testcases should go
> under g++.dg, not g++.old-deja. g++.dg don't unilateraly set any
> optimization level, I think that is a good path (we would have caught
> this regression).
I agree. I was just applying Roger's patch. I could (should?) have
asked Roger to rework his tests for the g++.dg testsuite, but I wanted
to close the PR quickly so we could go on to other things. In hindsight,
that was a mistake.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list