relax requirements for vector==

Phil Edwards pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
Tue Mar 6 15:50:00 GMT 2001


On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 03:46:39PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
> Instead of relaxing requirements, perhaps a more sane thing to do is
> to make the concept checking code a flag you have to turn on (at
> configure time?), and not something that is forced on everybody's code.

I'd rather do it at user-code-compilation time, and I'd planned on looking
at the nominal replacement code with this in mind.


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list