libstdc++ license

[Benjamin Kosnik]

> > Is there any document that says that this exception applies to libstdc++ 
> > as a whole?  Looking at the 2.95.3 source tarball, I only see the 
> > exception on some of the headers files.  Since I can't seem to find any 
> > toplevel document that explicitly states the license of libstdc++ and 
> > not all of the source files contain the same license header, I'm unsure 
> > of the situation.

[snip]

> Guh.  Well, the /intent/ is that the license applies to the whole library.
> Probably we should go through and redo the comment blocks at some point,
> but I'm not a lawyer.

FYI libstdc++-v3 should have the same license on all source and include 
files. If there are somehow files missing copyrights, they should have 
the correct copyright/licence info added.