[PATCH] More implicit typename fixes

[Nathan Myers]

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:54:42AM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam@cantrip.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:58:51PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >> Nathan Myers wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 10:44:29PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >> > >       typedef typename ctype::mask  mask;       <====== 169
> >> >
> > Actually, looking deeper, it [might] be better just to use 
> >   using ctype_base::mask;
> > if it works.
> 
> That doesn't help the compiler to see that it's a type, so I don't 
> think it should.

I think that since ctype_base is not a template, it can be looked up 
in phase one, and all its details (not just its typeness) known during 
parsing of member templates.  Am I wrong?

Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip dot org