New FreeBSD failures (somewhat) debugged
Benjamin Kosnik
bkoz@redhat.com
Thu Dec 13 13:34:00 GMT 2001
> You're right in that right now <limits> is trying to match what the
> compiler says limits are, not what the host "C" library says they
> are. After Loren's analysis, I agree that we should match the host "C"
> library views. Does everybody agree?
Sure. You're the boss.
;)
This appears to be a non-optimal solution, however: why can't the "C"
library headers and the compiler (gcc/g++) agree? This mis-match seems odd
to me and a potential source of bugs later.
I confess I'm busy and I don't really understand the ins and outs of this
particular issue though. I long for the day of the old limits
script...
Let's at least try this, and hopefully the numerics failure will also go
away for BSD. (In any case, let's try to resolve that first, before the
27_io/*.cc FAILS.)
thanks,
benjamin
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list