[v3] long long, c99 support

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Fri Apr 20 09:54:00 GMT 2001


> The point here being that ::c99 is no longer reserved.  I don't think
> it is a good idea to reserve ::c99.  V3 is making too much assumptions.

Ok. This was checked in with your modifications.

> But, we should not remove testcases which show something is broken with
> V3.

yeah. You are right. I'll add another test case as XFAIL.

thanks,
benjamin



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list