[patch] mkcshadow improvements
Tue May 16 13:34:00 GMT 2000
> Since "we" are the implementor, "we" can choose to define any
> instance of undefined behavior. And, in fact, gcc-2.96 seems to
> permit it. But it's academic, because it doesn't seem safe enough
> to be useful.
Whoa! So strident sounding are you!
I suppose this same property allows us to call this thing _C_ (reserved
for implementors) instead of _C_something_that_makes_sense_to_nathan?
More information about the Libstdc++