IF the trig funs work THEN this happens
Branko
Branko
Sat Jun 10 10:16:00 GMT 2000
Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> Well, if I add the cosf/sinf/sqrtf.lo files to LIBMATHOBJS and
> libmath_la_LIBADD targets manually, and then also apply the following patch
> (fabs needs to be declared; and "iff" LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set then we need
> to prepend LIB_PATH during checking), then everything builds and only two
> tests fail:
>
> - 3 97.657 227097 3952 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc
> - 6 99.337 23973 184 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc
> - 7 0.000 548887 8000 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc
> - 6 0.000 51187 1192 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc
>
> Both static and dynamic fail with runtime errors, so we get 134/4 results.
>
> I'm going to go ahead and check in the complex_inserters_extractors patch,
> but I won't do the mkcheck.in yet -- opinions?
On Solaris 2.6, I get:
- 10 0.000 text 415054 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc
- 9 0.000 text 46331 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc
- 11 0.000 text 422094 27_io/istream_unformatted.cc
- 9 0.000 text 48436 27_io/istream_unformatted.cc
I think the mkcheck.in patch can go in, too.
Brane
--
Branko Čibej <branko.cibej@hermes.si>
HERMES SoftLab, Litijska 51, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
voice: (+386 1) 586 53 49 fax: (+386 1) 586 52 70
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list