[2.90.9] planning for the next release
Dr. David Gilbert
dg@px.uk.com
Sat Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2000
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> *HELL NO*
>
> Now that v-3's well nigh impossible to build without compiler sources
> anyway, it sounds like an increasingly good idea. I'm hoping this would
> make it easier to test g++ with libstdc++-v3 too. . .
Heck, I'd agree as well - I suspect a lot of new people get libstdc++-v3
because they have a particular problem that the old lib can't cope with;
and then kill their gcc when trying to compile it and then end up having
to get a new GCC anyway.
Also what with the GCC guys starting to get organised for a 3.0
release it would be really nice to pull them all together.
Dave
/------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Work:dg@px.uk.com +44-161-286-2000 Ex258|
| -------- G7FHJ --------|---------------------------------------- |
| Home: dave@treblig.org http://www.treblig.org |
\------------------------------------------------------------------/
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list