[2.90.9] planning for the next release

Dr. David Gilbert dg@px.uk.com
Sat Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2000


On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> *HELL NO*
> 
> Now that v-3's well nigh impossible to build without compiler sources 
> anyway, it sounds like an increasingly good idea. I'm hoping this would 
> make it easier to test g++ with libstdc++-v3 too. . . 

Heck, I'd agree as well - I suspect a lot of new people get libstdc++-v3
because they have a particular problem that the old lib can't cope with;
and then kill their gcc when trying to compile it and then end up having
to get a new GCC anyway.

Also what with the GCC guys starting to get organised for a 3.0
release it would be really nice to pull them all together.

Dave
/------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Work:dg@px.uk.com +44-161-286-2000 Ex258|
| -------- G7FHJ --------|---------------------------------------- |
| Home: dave@treblig.org            http://www.treblig.org         |
\------------------------------------------------------------------/



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list