[gcc(refs/users/aoliva/heads/testme)] libstdc++: 60241.cc: tolerate slightly shorter aggregate sleep
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Jun 21 00:17:24 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ff3b788e20d6ff5d1e9830ecc27cc82ee90879a
commit 4ff3b788e20d6ff5d1e9830ecc27cc82ee90879a
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:44:10 2022 -0300
libstdc++: 60241.cc: tolerate slightly shorter aggregate sleep
On rtems under qemu, the frequently-interrupted nanosleep ends up
sleeping shorter than expected, by a margin of less than 0,3%.
I figured failing the library test over a system (emulator?) bug is
undesirable, so I put in some tolerance for the drift.
for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
* testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc: Tolerate a
slightly early wakeup.
Diff:
---
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
index 12dbeba1cc4..f3a5af453c4 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
@@ -51,9 +51,10 @@ test02()
std::thread t([&result, &sleeping] {
auto start = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
auto time = std::chrono::seconds(3);
+ auto tolerance = std::chrono::milliseconds(10);
sleeping = true;
std::this_thread::sleep_for(time);
- result = std::chrono::system_clock::now() >= (start + time);
+ result = std::chrono::system_clock::now() + tolerance >= (start + time);
sleeping = false;
});
while (!sleeping)
More information about the Libstdc++-cvs
mailing list