[PATCH v2 4/4] stdio-common: Suppress Clang warnings on scanf13.c with fortify enable

Andreas K. Huettel dilfridge@gentoo.org
Sat Jan 11 13:51:01 GMT 2025


Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2025, 19:12:14 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Adhemerval Zanella:
> clang-19 shows:
> 
> scanf13.c:28:40: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 4 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 11 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
>    28 |               "A%ms%10ms%4m[bcd]%4mcB", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4) != 4)
>       |                                               ^
> scanf13.c:94:34: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 3 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 2049 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
>    94 |   if (sscanf (buf, "%2048ms%mc", &sp3, &sp4) != 2)
>       |                                  ^
> scanf13.c:110:61: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 4 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 1501 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
>   110 |   if (sscanf (buf, "%4mc%1500m[dr/]%548m[abc/d]%3mc", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4)
>       |                                                             ^
> scanf13.c:110:67: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 5 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 549 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
>   110 |   if (sscanf (buf, "%4mc%1500m[dr/]%548m[abc/d]%3mc", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4)
> ---

Please add a brief remark on what the actual problem is (and why these warnings are bogus).

[my understanding - clang does not understand the 'nm' prefix telling sscanf to allocate
n+1 memory for the passed pointer to a string, and uses the pointer size instead to calculate
validity. however, since the actual call goes back to the c library, it works as intended?]

[[the sscanf manpage is a bit horrible w/r to %m]]

>  stdio-common/scanf13.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/stdio-common/scanf13.c b/stdio-common/scanf13.c
> index 65b1429720..131abb33de 100644
> --- a/stdio-common/scanf13.c
> +++ b/stdio-common/scanf13.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ main (void)
>    DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
>    DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-invalid-specifier");
>    DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-extra-args");
> +  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wfortify-source");
>    if (sscanf ("A  \xc3\x84-\t\t\xc3\x84-abcdefbcd\t\xc3\x84-B",
>  	      "A%ms%10ms%4m[bcd]%4mcB", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4) != 4)
>      FAIL ();
> @@ -91,6 +92,8 @@ main (void)
>  	FAIL ();
>        free (sp2);
>      }
> +  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
> +  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wfortify-source");
>    if (sscanf (buf, "%2048ms%mc", &sp3, &sp4) != 2)
>      FAIL ();
>    else
> @@ -131,6 +134,7 @@ main (void)
>  	FAIL ();
>        free (sp4);
>      }
> +  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
>    if (sscanf (buf, "%mS%mC", &lsp1, &lsp2) != 2)
>      FAIL ();
>    else
> @@ -150,6 +154,7 @@ main (void)
>    DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
>    DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-invalid-specifier");
>    DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-extra-args");
> +  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wfortify-source");
>    if (sscanf (buf, "%2048mls%mlc", &lsp3, &lsp4) != 2)
>      FAIL ();
>    else
> 


-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 981 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20250111/3c5dc047/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list