[PATCH v2 4/4] stdio-common: Suppress Clang warnings on scanf13.c with fortify enable
Andreas K. Huettel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Sat Jan 11 13:51:01 GMT 2025
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2025, 19:12:14 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Adhemerval Zanella:
> clang-19 shows:
>
> scanf13.c:28:40: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 4 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 11 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
> 28 | "A%ms%10ms%4m[bcd]%4mcB", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4) != 4)
> | ^
> scanf13.c:94:34: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 3 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 2049 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
> 94 | if (sscanf (buf, "%2048ms%mc", &sp3, &sp4) != 2)
> | ^
> scanf13.c:110:61: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 4 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 1501 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
> 110 | if (sscanf (buf, "%4mc%1500m[dr/]%548m[abc/d]%3mc", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4)
> | ^
> scanf13.c:110:67: error: 'sscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in argument 5 has size 8, but the corresponding specifier may require size 549 [-Werror,-Wfortify-source]
> 110 | if (sscanf (buf, "%4mc%1500m[dr/]%548m[abc/d]%3mc", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4)
> ---
Please add a brief remark on what the actual problem is (and why these warnings are bogus).
[my understanding - clang does not understand the 'nm' prefix telling sscanf to allocate
n+1 memory for the passed pointer to a string, and uses the pointer size instead to calculate
validity. however, since the actual call goes back to the c library, it works as intended?]
[[the sscanf manpage is a bit horrible w/r to %m]]
> stdio-common/scanf13.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/stdio-common/scanf13.c b/stdio-common/scanf13.c
> index 65b1429720..131abb33de 100644
> --- a/stdio-common/scanf13.c
> +++ b/stdio-common/scanf13.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ main (void)
> DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
> DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-invalid-specifier");
> DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-extra-args");
> + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wfortify-source");
> if (sscanf ("A \xc3\x84-\t\t\xc3\x84-abcdefbcd\t\xc3\x84-B",
> "A%ms%10ms%4m[bcd]%4mcB", &sp1, &sp2, &sp3, &sp4) != 4)
> FAIL ();
> @@ -91,6 +92,8 @@ main (void)
> FAIL ();
> free (sp2);
> }
> + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
> + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wfortify-source");
> if (sscanf (buf, "%2048ms%mc", &sp3, &sp4) != 2)
> FAIL ();
> else
> @@ -131,6 +134,7 @@ main (void)
> FAIL ();
> free (sp4);
> }
> + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
> if (sscanf (buf, "%mS%mC", &lsp1, &lsp2) != 2)
> FAIL ();
> else
> @@ -150,6 +154,7 @@ main (void)
> DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
> DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-invalid-specifier");
> DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wformat-extra-args");
> + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (13, "-Wfortify-source");
> if (sscanf (buf, "%2048mls%mlc", &lsp3, &lsp4) != 2)
> FAIL ();
> else
>
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 981 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20250111/3c5dc047/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list