[glibc] s390x: Regenerated ULPs

[Paul Zimmermann]

       Andreas,

thanks, I will try to remember that.

Stefan, now that 9cc9f8e is in, make check should work with gcc < 12.

Paul

> From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <andreas.huettel@ur.de>
> Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
>  adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:36:39 +0100
> Organization: Universitaet Regensburg
> 
> 
> [1:text/plain Hide]
> 
> OK, sounds good, let's do that. 
> 
> Paul, in the future, it helps to add a "Reviewed-by: " line in the e-mail reply to the patch, 
> since this is picked up by patchwork and shows up when going through the list of submitted 
> patches (the "rb" column)... Thanks!
> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2025, 16:05:40 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Paul Zimmermann:
> >        Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > yes, I believe we should revert 82688ca and apply patch 103895 from patchwork
> > (for which I gave a positive review).
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:01:35 +0100
> > > Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
> > >         Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> > > From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > On 09.01.25 13:55, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
> > > >        Hi Stefan,
> > > > 
> > > > after thought, Adhemerval already posted a patch for this issue:
> > > > 
> > > > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20250102143444.3574078-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org/
> > > > 
> > > > Does that solve the issue on s390x?
> > > > 
> > > > Paul
> > > 
> > > Yes, I've tried it on top of this commit without my ULPs update:
> > > f2be13300a (HEAD -> az-fix-acosf-20250109) math: Fix acosf when building
> > > with gcc <= 11
> > > 502a71c578 i686: Regenerate multiarch ulps
> > > 
> > > And it solves the issue on s390x with my gcc 11.5 and 10.5.
> > > Shall I just revert my commit 82688ca3107c93d9eba6440981e473d1877b6281
> > > "s390x: Regenerated ULPs" or shall Adhemerval remove the float-ULPs as
> > > also done for other archs?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stefan
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PD Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
> Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics
> University of Regensburg
> 93040 Regensburg
> Germany
> 
> tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile)
> tel. +49 941 943 1618 (office)
> e-mail andreas.huettel@ur.de
> https://www.akhuettel.de/
> https://www.akhuettel.de/group/
> 
> [2:application/pgp-signature Show Save:signature.asc (981B)]
>