[PATCH] nptl: Add <thread_pointer.h> for or1k
Stafford Horne
shorne@gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 20:18:19 GMT 2025
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:26:48PM -0500, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> On 2024-12-24 15:20, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > I think this ended up being ok.
> >
> > I have added the call to rseq_syscall and implemented self tests on my branch
> > now.
> >
> > - https://github.com/stffrdhrn/linux/commits/or1k-rseq/
> > - commit 1fa73dd6c2d3 ("rseq/selftests: Add support for OpenRISC")
> >
> > I haven't got the tests to complete fully yet though. Do you have a recommended
> > approach for building, testing and debugging them? I am using my glibc
> > toolchain, but I assume the original implementations didnt have glibc support
> > available when they were testing.
> >
> > My stack now:
> >
> > - QEMU virt
> > - Linux virt_defconfig (or1k-rseq branch)
> > - rseq selftests - built with gcc/glibc toolchain (or1k-rseq branch)
> > - rootfs - Buildroot with my glibc (or1k-rseq branch)
> > - gdb
> > - strace
> >
> > In general I am using the latest git HEADs for qemu, gcc, binutils etc.
> >
> > Once, everything is working on QEMU I will test again on the FPGA hardware.
> >
> > Currently tests are failing with SIGSEGV:
> >
> > TAP version 13
> > 1..10
> > # timeout set to 0
> > # selftests: rseq: basic_test
> > # testing current cpu
> > ok 1 selftests: rseq: basic_test
> > # timeout set to 0
> > # selftests: rseq: basic_percpu_ops_test
> > # spinlock
> > # ./kselftest/runner.sh: line 37: 772 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/timeout --foreground "$kselftest_timeout" /usr/bin/timeout "$kselftest_timeout" $1
> > not ok 2 selftests: rseq: basic_percpu_ops_test # exit=139
> >
> > In gdb it looks to be happening in in an mprotect syscall in glibc and at that
> > point the stack seems to be corrupt already. So its taking me a bit of time to
> > untangle.
> >
> > -Stafford
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I was away for the holidays. From your other message I
> think you managed to get through this. Is there anything I can still help you
> with?
No problem,
I figured you were on vacation. I just kept sending mails to document my
progress. The holiday's are when I get the most time to work on this stuff.
As of now there is nothing else needed.
-Stafford
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list