[PATCH 3/7] gmon: Remove ununsed LDFLAGS-tst-profile-static

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Jan 2 21:05:02 GMT 2025


On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 3:36 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto
<adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 31/12/24 17:52, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 2:27 AM Adhemerval Zanella
> > <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> It also fixes the test buidl when using clang.
> >> ---
> >>  gmon/Makefile | 6 ++----
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gmon/Makefile b/gmon/Makefile
> >> index db19c205d1..f44e7060a9 100644
> >> --- a/gmon/Makefile
> >> +++ b/gmon/Makefile
> >> @@ -43,10 +43,8 @@ tests = \
> >>    tst-sprofil \
> >>    # tests
> >>  ifeq ($(build-profile),yes)
> >> -tests += tst-profile-static
> >> -tests-static += tst-profile-static
> >
> > Why are these changes included?
> >
>
> They are not required, I will remove them.
>
> >> -
> >> -LDFLAGS-tst-profile-static = -profile
> >
> > Did you enable profile build? If yes, why is -profile unused?
>
> Yes and clang does not support -profile:

I haven't done a profile build for a long time.  What does
the profile build do to libc.so and libc.a?

>   clang: error: unknown argument '-profile'; did you mean '-fprofile'?
>
> And afaiu the -profile option on linking only instructs gcc to use -lc_p
> instead of -lc; which is not required anyway.

If -lc_p isn't needed, should these tests be enabled for the
non-profile build?

> >
> >> +tests  += tst-profile-static
> >> +tests-static   += tst-profile-static
> >>  endif
> >>
> >>  tests += tst-gmon-static
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >
> >
>


-- 
H.J.


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list