[PATCH 1/2] Add OVERRIDE and FINAL macros to coretypes.h
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 GMT 2016
On 05/06/2016 05:40 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> +#if __cplusplus >= 201103
> +/* C++11 claims to be available: use it: */
> +#define OVERRIDE override
> +#define FINAL final
> +#else
> +/* No C++11 support; leave the macros empty: */
> +#define OVERRIDE
> +#define FINAL
> +#endif
> +
Is there a reason this is preferred over using override/final in
the sources directly, and then define them away as empty
on pre-C++11?
I mean:
#if __cplusplus < 201103
# define override
# define final
#endif
then use override/final throughout instead of OVERRIDE/FINAL.
If building gcc as a C++11 program is supported, then it
won't be possible to use these names as symbols for
anything else anyway?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
More information about the Jit
mailing list