About gcj present and future
Ernesto
ernesto.bascon@gmail.com
Tue Jan 8 17:46:00 GMT 2013
>> 3. I read somewhere that gcj is in "active maintenance mode". Does
>> that mean that we can trust it will be available in next versions of
>> gcc? Or is there some plan to discontinue it? I want to start an app
>> on it and I would want to know it will be available for several years
>> now (CNI interface is a very amazing piece of technology).
>
> Well, yes. Good question. I'd love to restart active development of
> GCJ, but OpenJDK is free software and is way ahead in terms of
> features. GCJ has some advantages, but so far these haven't been enough
> to persuade people to work on it. If we don't do something soon it
> may be too late.
Could you please elaborate more on "way ahead in terms of features"?
Which features, for example?
Must we rely on the Java Class Libraries? Providing a nice set of
classes (an alternative framework) would be a feasible way to turn gcj
into a new life? (another UI framework, implementations on top of
existing native libre/open source, etc) As I told you in my first
email, I am new on gcj so maybe the things I'm writing on are unreal,
unfeasible or completely not applicable.
> Andrew.
Thanks!
Ernesto
More information about the Java
mailing list