Is gcj dead?

[Andrew Haley]

Yuri wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Yes, we should update that.  There hasn't been a lot of  new gcj
>> development,
>> but it is maintained.
>>
>>  
>>> Also I submitted few PRs a month ago and there is no response at all.
>>>     
>>
>> Which ones?
>>   
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41356
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41361

Can't reproduce this.
This is presumably a bug in the FreeBSD port of gcj.
I'm not sure who maintains gcj on FreeBSD.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41372
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41375
> And today I added one more:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41745

All of these seem to be FreeBSD specific.  I think that the FreeBSD
port must be broken.

The best plan is to build gcj from source and run the libgcj test
suite.  Then we'll know how brain-damaged the FreeBSD port really is.

Andrew.