libjvm missing .so version number

[Andrew Haley]

Jack Howarth writes:

 >     Shouldn't the shared libraries installed in lib/gcj-4.x.x have
 > .so version numbers since they appear to be shared libraries and
 > not modules ala python? Specifically on Darwin we see libjvm.dylib
 > built without an associated .so version number.

Sounds like a Darwin bug.  On GNU/Linux we have 

lrwxrwxrwx 1 aph aph        15 Jul 28 17:08 /home/aph/install/lib64/libgcj.so -> libgcj.so.7.0.0*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 aph aph        15 Jul 28 17:08 /home/aph/install/lib64/libgcj.so.7 -> libgcj.so.7.0.0*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 aph aph  84086938 Jul 28 17:08 /home/aph/install/lib64/libgcj.so.7.0.0*

Andrew.