micro-libgcj merge reconsidered

[Dalibor Topic]

Joel Dice wrote:

> In light of both of these concerns, I think the advice of Steph 
> Meslin-Weber and others is most appropriate - create a branch for 
> micro-libgcj as proposed, but without intending to merge it into the 
> trunk.  Others may then use that branch as a basis for their own 
> branches and take them in whatever directions they care to.  Elements 
> from any of these branches may then be merged back into the trunk if and 
> when there is demand for them.
> 
> How does that sound?
> 

Sounds excellent to me.

cheers,
dalibor topic