[gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!

[Mohan Embar]

Hi All,

>...but was holding off on submitting patches for these
>because I wanted to understand the nature of ecj1/ecjx
>better.

Let me try to rephrase my questions.

1. Is this analogy correct?:

gcj : ecjx as jc1 : ecj1?

If not, what is the correct analogy?

2. If my first analogy is correct, is the idea that gcj/jc1 will
supersede ecjx/ecj1 or will the two coexist?

-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/