Bug (old?) in ZipEntry?

[Martin Egholm Nielsen]

Hi,

>>Do you mind trying with the two test-archives I've attached - you're
>>free to ignore...
> This is weird - with the ZIP archives that you have provided
> me, the output is different for Sun's JDK 1.5.0.03 and current
> GCJ. I think you should file a bug against the "classpath"
> product in the GCC Bugzilla and attach the two archives.
Now, this is "good"... Or actually it's not - I'm supposed to use the 
feature ;-)
I'll produce two new archives without my company's standard copyright 
info...

Thanks for testing it Ranjit!

// Martin

> ------------------------------------ 8< ------------------------------------
> ~/tmp/men > java -version
> java version "1.5.0_03"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_03-b07)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_03-b07, mixed mode)
> ~/tmp/men > java ZipDates fromwinzip.zip
> ZipDates.java   date: 1126247514000     Fri Sep 09 12:01:54 IST 2005
> ~/tmp/men > java ZipDates fromzip.zip
> ZipDates.java   date: 1126247512000     Fri Sep 09 12:01:52 IST 2005
> ~/tmp/men > mygij -version
> java version "1.4.2"
> gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.1.0 20050913 (experimental)
> 
> Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> ~/tmp/men > mygij ZipDates fromwinzip.zip
> ZipDates.java   date: 1126247514265     Fri Sep 09 12:01:54 GMT+05:30 2005
> ~/tmp/men > mygij ZipDates fromzip.zip
> ZipDates.java   date: 4040499060112     Tue Jan 14 06:21:00 GMT+05:30 2098
> ~/tmp/men >
> ------------------------------------ 8< ------------------------------------
> 
> Ranjit.
>