Ranjit Mathew wrote: >Bryce McKinlay wrote: > > >>Could you explain the need for the gjavah changes more? Obviously, we >> >> > >See: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-08/msg00076.html > > Thanks. Perhaps the best approach is to add a "--disable-inlining" flag to gjavah and turn it on for mingw builds (or wherever weak symbols arn't supported). Bryce