Linker name conflicts due to optimization in gjavah

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Terry" == Terry Laurenzo <tlaurenzo@gmail.com> writes:

Terry> At the risk of offending the person who wrote the optimization code, I
Terry> suggest that it be taken out.  I found this in CVS head and the
Terry> 5/15/2005 snapshort.  Any objections?  Should a bug be opened?

I agree that we should take this out.  This code seems to violate the
one definition rule, at least in spirit.  It isn't surprising that
some change somewhere broke it.

If we think this kind of thing is still worthwhile, we could just as
easily achieve it by emitting CNI headers without access protection
and just directly mucking about with fields.

Tom