PATCH: Re: Fwd: Typo in online GCJ docs.

[Bryce McKinlay]

Thanks for the fixes, Thomas. I'm checking in this docs patch. In 
future, you can submit patches directly against gcj.texi if you like.

Regards

Bryce


2005-04-20  Bryce McKinlay  <mckinlay@redhat.com>

    * gcj.texi: Fix typos and bogus example.

--- gcj.texi    7 Apr 2005 15:48:02 -0000       1.80
+++ gcj.texi    21 Apr 2005 00:05:37 -0000
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
 reference to the object points to the dispatch table pointer.)
 
 The fields are laid out in the same order, alignment, and size as in
-C++.  Specifically, 8-bite and 16-bit native types (@code{byte},
+C++.  Specifically, 8-bit and 16-bit native types (@code{byte},
 @code{short}, @code{char}, and @code{boolean}) are @emph{not} widened
 to 32 bits.  Note that the Java VM does extend 8-bit and 16-bit types
 to 32 bits when on the VM stack or temporary registers.
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@
 @{
   public int i;
   public Integer (int i) @{ this.i = i; @}
-  public static zero = new Integer(0);
+  public static Int zero = new Int(0);
 @}
 @end example
 
@@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@
 
 Accessing a static field also requires the class of the
 field to be initialized.  The Java compiler will generate code
-to call @code{Jv_InitClass} before getting or setting the field.
+to call @code{JvInitClass} before getting or setting the field.
 However, the C++ compiler will not generate this extra code,
 so it is your responsibility to make sure the class is
 initialized before you access a static field from C++.


Mike Stump wrote:

> From the gcc list:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>
>> Date: April 20, 2005 4:11:32 PM PDT
>> To: gcc@gnu.org
>> Subject: Typo in online GCJ docs.
>>
>>
>> In page:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Objects-and-Classes.html
>>
>> - Specifically, 8-bite and 16-bit native types
>> + Specifically, 8-bit and 16-bit native types
>>
>> On the same page there is a Java example that will not compile, I  
>> found and
>> fixed 3 bugs; Please replace with:
>>      public class Int
>>      {
>>        public int i;
>>        public Int(int i) { this.i = i; }
>>        public static Int zero = new Int(0);
>>      }
>>
>>
>> On page:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Class-Initialization.html
>> Both JvInitClass and Jv_InitClass are used; which one is it?
>>
>> Please forward to the maintainer or if you can, fix it in the source.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- 
>> Thomas Zander
>>
>