Obfuscation - optimisation?
Martin Egholm Nielsen
Fri Nov 26 11:30:00 GMT 2004
> I should learn to try something before opening my mouth. I had always
> been told Obfuscation only had a small side benefit in code size
> reduction. However, I tried it on a 192kb applet I wrote, and just
> the obfuscation step reduced the jar file to 162kb.
> However, one thing still puzzles me. What does this have to do with
> gcj? While I am certain an optimization flag could be added and code
> from something like proguard could be merged, it seems to me the more
> important thing right now is just a fully stable compiler and API
> classes. Obfuscation can always run as a separate step, regardless of
> what java compiler is used.
The intention of this thread had nothing to do with getting obfuscation
into gcj as a new feature. It was ment as a question to the current
versions, that's all...
More information about the Java