[Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Mon Mar 15 18:39:00 GMT 2004
Tom Tromey writes:
> >>>>> "Cedric" == Cedric Berger <cedric@berger.to> writes:
>
> [ followups trimmed ]
>
> >> How about asking Sun to support CNI then ?
>
> Cedric> Bleah
> Cedric> They technically cannot support it.
> Cedric> CNI doesn't work with precise copying collectors, AFAIK.
>
> CNI requires modifications to your C++ compiler to work.
> There's no technical reason that one couldn't modify a C++ compiler
> to also work with a precise copying collector while you're at it.
>
> That's not to say it might not be hard. For GCC it looks basically
> unfeasible. I suspect nobody will ever make the effort.
>
> Perhaps this is a distinction without a difference? Sometimes I find
> it interesting to contemplate CNI's definition as separable from its
> current implementation.
Bear in mind that CNI's definition is about to change, and change in a
way that (I think) would remove the objections about it not being
suitable for moving collectors.
Real soon now...
Andrew.
More information about the Java
mailing list